Labour's secret plans to slash £100 million from the budget for nature-friendly farming in England will devastate nature recovery and family farms. The decision, aimed at addressing what ministers describe as a £22 billion Treasury shortfall, while they give huge pay increases to unions has been met with strong opposition from farmers and environmental groups alike. Critics argue that the cut could severely undermine efforts to meet the government’s legally binding targets to improve nature, with devastating consequences for both wildlife and rural communities.
According to research by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), this budget reduction could result in at least 239,000 fewer hectares of farmland being managed in a nature-friendly way. The impact could be even greater if the smaller budget discourages farmers from applying for the funds they need to adopt sustainable practices.
James Wright, Director of Policy at the Conservative Rural Forum, expressed deep concern over the proposed cuts. "Maintaining strong support for nature-friendly farming is crucial not just for our environment, but for the survival of family farms across the country," Wright said. "The Conservatives had committed an extra £200 million per year in their manifesto to ensure that our countryside thrives, both economically and ecologically. This drastic reduction by Labour risks undoing years of progress and could leave our rural communities vulnerable."
Wright’s comments reflect broader anxieties in rural areas, where many feel that Labour’s policies are increasingly out of touch with the realities faced by farmers and landowners. As the Autumn Statement approaches, there is growing concern that this £100 million cut could be just the beginning of a wider shift in priorities that could leave the countryside at a disadvantage.
With nature groups warning that these cuts jeopardise legally binding environmental goals, the debate over how best to balance economic and environmental needs is likely to intensify in the coming weeks. For now, however, the message from rural advocates is clear: the budget must be maintained if England’s farmland and wildlife are to be protected for future generations.
🔗 Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/sep/03/englands-na…;
